MAJOR ARSON SUSPECT OBSESSED OVER LUIGI MANGIONE AND WANTED TO KILL THE RICH, PROSECUTORS SAY:
The suspect accused of starting one of the largest wildfires in Los Angeles history, fixated on Luigi Mangione weeks before starting the blaze out of resentment for the rich, according to federal prosecutors.
Federal prosecutors said in a trial memorandum that 30-year-old Jonathan Rinderknecht demonstrated an obsession with Mangione in the days before he started the Lachman and Palisades Fires on January 1, 2025. Mangione has developed a cult following among the Left after he was arrested for gunning down Brian Thompson, the CEO of UnitedHealthcare.
âOn January 24, 2025, when investigators asked defendant why someone might commit arson in the Pacific Palisades, he responded that it would be out of resentment of the rich enjoying their money as âweâre basically being enslaved by themâ and compared such an act of âdesperationâ to the murder for which Mangione was charged,â the memo said.
The memo added that Uber passengers who rode with Rinderknecht on December 31 and January 1 recounted him being âangry, intense, driving erratically, and ranting about being âpissed off at the worldâ and Luigi Mangione, capitalism, and vigilantism.â
Related: At the Wall Street Journal’s Substack, former Popular Mechanics editor James Meigs writes: Political Violence Is Cool Now.
Why do so many elites support violent extremism?
We used to have a stereotype that political violence typically emerges from the uneducated mob. Today, the opposite is true. Some of todayâs most bloodthirsty rhetoric can be heard on college campuses or from influencers embraced by political elites. âKill those motherfââ,â Mr. Piker once said, speaking of landlords. âLet the streets soak in their fâ red capitalist blood!â In a New York Times column originally headlined, âHasan Piker is Not the Enemy,â liberal centrist Ezra Klein argued that Democrats should not write firebrands like Mr. Piker âout of acceptable political discourse.â The celebration of violence isnât some depravity found only in Americaâs political swamps. Itâs a viewpoint widely tolerated, even encouraged, among denizens of our cultural high ground. Yes, the right has its share of scary extremists, too. But their ideas get far less prominence in our mainstream culture. And, unlike some leftist icons, theyâre not teaching at Ivy League universities.
Once, I would have argued that education is the best antidote to violent extremism. People need to learn tolerance for other viewpoints and the value of fair-minded debate. Again, the opposite appears to be true today. A recent survey by the Skeptic Research Center found that people with advanced academic degrees âwere about twice as likely to support political violence than those with less formal education.â And the people committing violence arenât anonymous losers. Both Luigi Mangione and Cole Allen, the latest would-be presidential assassin, were graduates of elite universities.
Miegs concludes, “To get out of this spiral of violence, our country will need to reset its moral compass. Iâm not hopeful that such reform will come from the top down. It may have to come from the bottom up.”
But leftists with a love of Radical Chic will do everything they can to prevent that change from happening:
“Exploiting the grief of the people in the Palisades:”