SHE AND THE MEDIA DID EVERYTHING BUT FIRE UP THE ENOLA GAY: Harris Campaign Didn’t Go Negative Enough on Trump, DNC Autopsy Concludes.
A newly-released Democratic National Committee report looking back at how the party lost the 2024 election concludes that then-Vice President Kamala Harris lost, in part, because she failed to focus sufficient negative attention on President Trump.
“The national campaign did not effectively drive Trump’s negatives, and the White House did not effectively support Vice President Harris over three and half years to improve her standing before the candidate switch,” reads the autopsy, written by Democratic strategist Paul Rivera, who was asked by the DNC to investigate why the party failed to wing big in 2024.
Rivera goes on to suggest that Democrats failed to remind Americans why they disliked Trump in his first term.
She should have really called Trump a super-duper really evil Nazi poopy-head than simply just another Hitler, I guess: In October of 2024,Kamala was comparing Trump to Hitler (while aggressively seeking endorsements from Dick Cheney and George W. Bush, who were Hitler from 2001 to 2008):
Yesterday, V.P. Harris compared President Trump to Hitler, “Donald Trump is out for unchecked power. He wants a military like Adolf Hitler had, who will be loyal to him, not our Constitution. He is unhinged, unstable, and given a second term, there would be no one to stop him from pursuing his worst impulses.”
The V.P.’s comment comparing Trump to Hitler indicates she doesn’t care about minimizing the horrors of the Holocaust or she is an imbecile incapable of understanding.
Her comments were based on a story in the leftist magazine The Atlantic reporting that Trump’s former chief of staff, Gen. John Kelly, called Trump a “fascist” and recalled his admiration for Nazi generals. Kelly also raised concerns about Trump’s recent threats to use the military against “the enemy from within.”
Flashback: Are Democrats Whitewashing Hitler with Lame Attacks on Trump?
UPDATE: DNC Releases, Then Disowns, 2024 Election Autopsy.
The document is incomplete. For example, it does not mention Harris’ running mate, Tim Walz, a single time, nor does it analyze her choice of running mate. It incorrectly cites data — at times failing to provide any sourcing at all.
For example, in one section reviewing the party’s “state of technology and data,” the report appeared to lift passages from other sources without any citation.
The report said: “Knowledge about voters was stored separately from data about campaign interactions, because those databases were developed by different teams who had little interest in making their systems compatible.”
And in a 2012 MIT Technology Review article, authored by Sasha Issenberg: “As was typical in political information infrastructure, knowledge about people was stored separately from data about the campaign’s interactions with them, mostly because the databases built for those purposes had been developed by different consultants who had no interest in making their systems work together.”
And thus Joe Biden’s career comes full circle. Perhaps Neil Kinnock and the autopen contributed to the report as well.