DISPATCHES FROM THE BLUE ZONES:

Spencer Pratt adds, “5 in a week? Just wait til the earthquake.”

THIS IS WAS CNN:

“Without the Holocaust and all that stuff.” In 2001, Jonah Goldberg wrote, “Aside from the murder and genocide, what exactly don’t you like about National Socialism?” He concluded, “I’ve never met a real social-welfare state leftist who could answer [that] question without having to think real hard.”

To be fair, “thinking real hard” has never been Lemon’s strong suit: CNN’s Don Lemon Asks If a Black Hole Could’ve Swallowed the Missing Plane.

I’M SIMPLY SAYING THAT LLMs, UH… FIND A WAY:

THEY NEED GUNS: How Important Are Gun Rights? Ask an Average Iranian Citizen These Days. “The numbers of Iranian citizens murdered by Iran’s rulers are still being counted, but President Trump identified the central truth that courage alone cannot overcome a government willing to use overwhelming force against a defenseless population.”

AND THE LEFT NEVER FORGAVE HIM FOR IT:

UPDATE (From Ed):

Earlier: Young conservatives have an unlikely new icon: Richard Nixon. “‘Nixonmaxxing’ swag and TikTok videos have helped trigger a rethinking of the former president’s legacy among some conservatives.”

DAVID LAMMY SACKED BY NEW PM ANDY BURNHAM: Lammy and Reeves among first senior ministers to leave after Burnham takes power.

What will happen to Lammy’s scheme to abolish most jury trials in the UK?

Flashbacks:

Trump inflamed George Floyd row to ‘distract from Covid,’ Lammy claimed.

‘Key moment’ David Lammy ridiculed for not knowing when Churchill became Prime Minister.

Climate a more fundamental threat than terror – Lammy.

MAKE PILLORIES GREAT AGAIN:

JOHN PODHORETZ REVIEWS THE ODYSSEY

Christopher Nolan does something extraordinarily nervy in his overwhelming new film, The Odyssey. He has made as faithful a version of Homer’s poem as could possibly be made in the course of a three-hour running time—all while turning its worldview inside out.

The thing is, detail by detail, The Odyssey is not just faithful, it’s absolutely inspired. It’s possible that this is the single-greatest cinematic adaptation of a great work of literature in the 113-year history of the motion picture as a popular art form.

Nolan hits every story beat, makes staggering visual poetry out of Homer’s oracular poetry, and even finds a way to evoke the twisty-turny narrative through which Homer reveals the story of Odysseus’ 10-year journey home from the Trojan War and the crisis his absence has created in his home kingdom of Ithaca.

In 2006, when the pro-gay movie Brokeback Mountain didn’t go over the magical 100 million mark in domestic grosses, before Twitter existed and Facebook was just getting started, Mark Steyn noted that “The more artful leftie websites have taken to complaining that the religious right deliberately killed [Brokeback] at the box-office by declining to get mad about it.”

In contrast, a year of freakouts on the right over Nolan’s casting choices likely helped The Odyssey’s opening box office enormously:

And whatever his stylistic excesses as a director, Christopher Nolan is no dummy: The Odyssey’s Christopher Nolan Just Did the Unthinkable.

Nolan’s “The Odyssey” earned a whopping $264 million globally in its opening weekend. The film is an adaptation of Homer’s ancient poem, a beloved part of world literature that hardly screams “box office catnip!”

And, if any other director had helmed it, the ticket sales would be dramatically lower. It’s undeniable.

What’s almost as newsworthy? Nolan sat down with the folks at Fox News’ “Fox & Friends Weekend” for an extended chat about “The Odyssey.”

What’s important about that? Sadly, everything.

Hollywood stars rarely grace Fox News in any capacity. The ones that do are the usual right-leaning suspects – Dean Cain, Kelsey Grammer and Jon Voight.

Would Mark Ruffalo drop by to discuss his latest project? Scarlett Johansson? Madonna?

Steven Spielberg? Quentin Tarantino?

Not a chance to very, very unlikely.

Yet Nolan, who isn’t a conservative nor does he broach politics in his promotional chats, graciously dropped by the show to promote his film.

As this Vanity Fair headline suggests, Hollywood is using The Odyssey’s success to take a victory lap: The Odyssey’s Epic Box Office Haul Breaks The “Go Woke, Go Broke” Myth.

Tweet continues, ” that always emboldens the Left. Because of that, I expect to see studios trying to poke the bear in a similar way in the coming year.”

Thus continuing the post-Covid cycle of audiences conditioning themselves to see one or two blockbuster movies a year, rather than old days (i.e. the 1980s through the mid-2010s) when they went to the movies almost every week, particularly in the summer. Good luck, I want you to know we’re all counting on you.

EVERY RECORD HAS BEEN FALSIFIED:

IF YOU GO CARRYING PICTURES OF CHAIRMAN MAO, YOU AIN’T GONNA MAKE IT WITH ANYONE ANYHOW:

Particularly if you cosplay in his togs: Hasan Piker Calls For an Ideological Purge of the Democratic Party—Dressed Like Mao—in Fiery Speech.

UPDATE: Omelettes, eggs, etc.:

HARDER THAN THEY THINK: Could China and Russia really destroy Starlink? Only with a boomerang. Though the lawfare is already underway.

So, how might China and Russia go about countering Starlink? The Chinese team proposed three possible actions in an “escalation ladder,” starting with legal and diplomatic measures aimed at whipping up international pressure against further expansions of Starlink on the grounds of collision risks in LEO.

The next step is more technical, with coordinated filings with international regulatory bodies for frequency bands and orbital slots to limit SpaceX’s ability to grow Starlink. At the same time, the escalation ladder proposes using electromagnetic jamming of Starlink to block it in certain regions.

Finally, the coup de grâce would be the “physical destruction” of Starlink through a cyber war and anti-satellite weapons. Reporters at The Insider, Der Spiegel, and Le Monde suggested this might involve a cloud of high-density projectiles that could destroy Starlink satellites upon collision. The presentation by the Chinese CASC researchers didn’t specify the means of such an attack.

The problem is that there are over 10,000 Starlink satellites, and SpaceX can literally launch them faster than Russia and China can shoot them down with conventional antisatellite weapons. A nuke, or a huge space-junk-creating kinetic-shrapnel weapon might work, but at the cost of making Low Earth Orbit inaccessible for everyone.

I should also note that it’s been the US position since the Carter Administration that an attack on a US satellite is an attack on the United States.

THAT’S NOT WHAT THE ODYSSEY IS ABOUT, CHRIS:

“Even as warped and subverted Nolan’s version is from the original, his movie doesn’t at all communicate the need to be hospitable and kind to strangers. That doesn’t actually come through in his telling at all.”

LUNCHTIME FUN:

BREAKING: Manhattan Federal Building Hit with Molotov Cocktail; Anti-ICE Activist Arrested.

A federal building in lower Manhattan got set aflame with an “incendiary device” this morning. The video of the attack, from two different angles, shows that the danger went well beyond a “scare:”

 

ABC News went on to report that the device appeared to be a fireworks-initiated Molotov cocktail. Law enforcement immediately arrested a suspect, whose track record will surprise no one paying attention the last eighteen months:

There was a scare outside 26 Federal Plaza in Lower Manhattan Monday morning when someone released what appeared to be a smoke grenade outside the building.

Police say the person is believed to be a protester with a history of anti-ICE activity.

Officers quickly secured the area and the suspect was taken into custody.

Authorities said the “makeshift incendiary device” was made up of fireworks and a flammable liquid.

That’s no “smoke grenade.” It’s a device intended to set fire to buildings and people. This is an event of domestic terrorism, one that could have killed people had luck changed just a little. It’s curious that ABC News felt the urge to minimize this in its lead and only related the nature of the device later in the article.

Or perhaps, it’s not all that curious.

No enemies to the left; when the late Robert Redford was promoting his 2012 film about the Weathermen domestic terrorists, it was hard to tell who was more fired up about it, him or ABC’s George Stephanopoulos:

Stephanopoulos was so enthusiastic towards Robert Redford and his sympathetic new film about an ex-1960s radical that the actor enthused, “You ought to get on the marketing team!” The aging actor/director appeared on Tuesday’s Good Morning America and endorsed the violent actions of protest groups. Reminiscing on his own past, the liberal Hollywood star recounted, “When I was younger, I was very much aware of the movement. I was more than sympathetic, I was probably empathetic because I believed it was time for a change.”

After Stephanopoulos wondered, “Even when you read about bombings,” Redford responded, “All of it. I knew that it was extreme and I guess movements have to be extreme to some degree.”

Unfortunately, it seems like many at ABC News would agree with that attitude today.

UPDATE:

ELECTION INTEGRITY: RNC Opens New Front in Election Integrity Battle Over ‘Never Residents’ Voting in 6 States.

The RNC has sued battleground states Arizona and Nevada; blue states such as Colorado, New Jersey, and Virginia; and the red state of Nebraska over laws allowing non-residents to vote. These cases are narrowly focused on closing state loopholes that allow people who never lived in a state to vote by absentee ballot.

“If you’ve never lived in a state, you shouldn’t be voting in its elections,” RNC Chairman Joe Gruters told the Daily Signal in a statement.

“The RNC already put a stop to this unconstitutional loophole in North Carolina, and we’re taking Nebraska, Colorado, Nevada, and New Jersey to court to do the same,” he said. “We’ll keep fighting to ensure elections are only decided by legal residents.”

The Federal Voting Assistance Program lists 38 states that allow some form of voting by residents who never lived in a state. Typically, the states allow an American residing abroad with parents living in that state to vote by absentee ballot.

Colorado might be the worst offender, courtesy of Secretary of State Jena Griswold: RNC Sues Colorado Secretary of State for Unlawfully Allowing Non-Residents to Vote.

This is from June:

The lawsuit challenges a Colorado law and election policy that allow certain people who have never lived in Colorado – and in some cases have never lived in the United States – to vote in Colorado elections.

Colorado’s Constitution is clear: voting is reserved for Colorado residents.

Griswold’s policy allows people to vote based solely on the past residency of a parent, guardian, or spouse, despite never having lived in Colorado themselves.

The lawsuit seeks to strike down Colorado’s unconstitutional “never-resident voter” law and stop its enforcement.

The lawsuit also seeks the removal of ineligible never-resident voters from Colorado’s voter rolls.

Stay tuned.