PLENTY OF COOLING POTENTIAL: Should Data Centers Go Seasteading?

“Some developers are now exploring the ocean as a new location for AI infrastructure in the hopes that underwater data centers could improve energy use and cooling efficiency while using less fresh water and land area than onshore buildings,” writes University of North Carolina Greensboro management professor Nir Kshetri, who studies the social and environmental effects of emerging technology. He calls under-the-sea data centers “a promising new approach for supporting the growth of AI.”

Underwater data centers would be not technically be “seasteaders”—autonomous entities based far enough offshore that they’re not subject to the rules of any government.

Even if underwater data centers could be based physically far enough from shore that they’re not in anyone’s national waters—not necessarily impossible, but impractical, costly, and a logistical nightmare—they would still be subject to various rules of international waters and would still need cables connecting them to land. They would also be run by tech companies based within an existing country’s borders and subject to that country’s oversight and regulations.

Orbital data centers require no cables.

HE’S A RISK:

THIS IS WHAT 21ST CENTURY “CONSPIRACIES” LOOK LIKE:

KRUISER’S MORNING BRIEFING: SCOTUS Has a Sylvia Plath Episode Regarding Mail-In Ballots. “Just three weeks ago, I wrote here that the Supreme Court was attempting to preserve ‘a modicum of sanity’ in our thoroughly insane vote-by-mail lunacy. There were still a lot of legal challenges in the judicial pipeline and there were concerns about the timing of the changes to the rules. Last night, SCOTUS decided that the dangerous status quo was safe for now.”

PROGRESSIVISM AS A TEMPER TANTRUM, EXHIBIT #1,000,006: Pete Buttigieg Says Dems Must Pack SCOTUS Because It’s Too ‘Partisan.’ “This is Buttigieg complaining that the rules must be changed when they no longer favor Democrats. It’s the same argument they make about the Electoral College every time they lose a presidential election.”

His actual priorities while in office: Buttigieg says America’s highways are racist and infrastructure bill will help fix it.

I’d also add that if the “infrastructure” bill actually accomplished anything tangible and lasting — while Buttigieg was SecTrans — I’ve yet to hear of it.

WELL, THAT WAS EASY. Don Surber: We Beat Climate Change! Hurricanes are a thing of the past, right?

Climate change is dead according to the rules laid out by its proponents. They said there would not be snow. There was. They said there would be lots of hurricanes. There aren’t.

Richard Feynman wrote, “First we guess it. Then we compute the consequences of the guess. Then we compare the result of the computation to nature, with experiment or experience. If it disagrees with experiment it is wrong. In that simple statement is the key to science. It does not make any difference how beautiful your guess is. It does not make any difference how smart you are, who made the guess, or what his name is—if it disagrees with experiment it is wrong. That is all there is to it.”

A decade later, he warned, “The first principle is that you must not fool yourself—and you are the easiest person to fool. So you have to be very careful about that. After you’ve not fooled yourself, it’s easy not to fool other scientists.”

It’s not science if it can’t make correct, testable, predictions.

IT WASN’T AN ACCIDENT: Neuroticism, Narcissism, and Nihilism Strangled Natalism. “Birth rates keep falling in almost every country. Fertility rates have remained below replacement rate for a generation in most of the developed world. Yet a birth gap has emerged. People who start families are having children at rates consistent with history. The overall decline is driven by the growing share of those who have none. We must do everything we can to counter the demoralization. The dating, labor, and housing markets critical to family formation are are broken.”

None of this is an accident.

HE’S LOSING IN 2028 TO THE WOMAN WHOSE CAMPAIGN FLOUNDERED BEFORE IOWA IN 2020:

Actually, Harris didn’t even make it all the way to Jan 1, 2020, much less Iowa.

ROBERT SPENCER: Islamic Scholar Says Grooming Gangs ‘Have Nothing to Do With Islam.’ (Except They Do.) “Hey, this is a relief: the Muslim grooming gangs that raped and assaulted over 250,000 British girls actually have nothing to do with Islam. So all you ‘Islamophobes’ need to sit down and shut up, because at last we have an Islamic voice speaking out loud and clear against these gangs, and not just any Muslim voice, either, but a leading Islamic scholar. There are still a few problems with this rosy scenario, but don’t worry: we’re really on our way now to our glorious multicultural future.”

CAN CONFIRM:

DISPATCHES FROM THE RELIGION OF PEACE:

ROGER KIMBALL: The Madness of the Anti-AI Crowd.

What is novel in many of our current perturbations is the behind-the-scenes interventions of more or less malevolent, and in many cases malevolent foreign, actors. The extraordinary popular delusions and madness of the COVID crowds is a case in point. Four or five years on, we have largely forgotten the mask-wearing, social-distancing, economy-blighting harridans of both sexes who acted as the enforcers of the COVID hysteria that China bequeathed us. It will soon be the same as the windmill-championing net-zero lunatics who have worked assiduously to dismantle Western prosperity. Are you surprised that China, Russia, and the Arab states eagerly abet the Greta Thunbergs of the world?

The latest delusional entertainment is the “AI-is-the-Antichrist” brigade. Two things happened last week to make this new panic snap into focus. First, frenetic socialist loudmouth Sen. Bernie Sanders and Rep. Greg Casar, chairman of the Congressional Progressive Caucus (yes, really), want to impose a moratorium on what they call “artificial superintelligence.” And what if the AI companies of the world ignore them and persist? Sanders and Casar want the state to come down on them with draconian force. “Entities,” they write, “shall be subject to the corporate death penalty, and persons shall be subject to not more than 20 years in prison, which is similar to existing penalties related to unlawfully developing nuclear weapons.”

What’s that chuckling you hear backstage to the left? Why, that would be the tittering of Chairman Xi and his posse of Chinese AI developers. Bernie Sanders is doubtless one of their favorite American politicians.

If he wasn’t already, he certainly is now.

A COMPLETE GUIDE TO ANARCHO-TYRANNY IN ONE TWEET:

OLD AND BUSTED: ChatGPT.

The New Hotness? Chat Pinot Gris:

In contrast:

YOU LAUGH, BUT WE’LL SOON HEAR HOW HURRICANES ARE VITAL TO THE ECOLOGY OF THE MIDWEST AND SOUTHWEST:

Without even an admission that just a few months ago there were dire predictions of more hurricanes due to “climate change.”

BRYAN CAPLAN: Neurotic Politics. “Quick version: When neurotics turn to politics, they find an infinite series of reasons to feel bad, which helps them stay one step ahead of the realization that their fundamental problem is inside their own heads and can be fixed by no one but themselves.”

ACTUALLY, AS PAUL STARES WROTE YEARS AGO, THE UNITED STATES HAD FUNCTIONAL ANTISATELLITE WEAPONS AND SATELLITE INTERCEPTORS BASED ON THE AGENA CHASSIS BACK IN THE SIXTIES:

But the technology has advanced rather a lot since then.

OPEN THREAD: Monday, Monday.

BIG SHORT TRADER MICHAEL BURRY SLAMS OPENAI, ANTHROPIC FOR ‘SELF-SERVING’ CALLS TO SLOW AI:

Famed investor Michael Burry slammed leaders of OpenAI, Anthropic and other tech giants for orchestrating a “self-serving” call to slow the pace of AI development – joining tech bigwigs, President Trump and even the Chinese government in panning so-called AI fear-mongering.

Burry – the short-seller lionized in Hollywood blockbuster “The Big Short” for calling and profiting from the subprime mortgage crisis circa 2008 – wrote on X: “Let’s all take a moment to understand how self-serving it is for OpenAI, Anthropic and other execs of big hyperscalers to talk of slowing things down.”

Burry said AI juggernauts’s calls to hit the brakes were “cover for real uncontrollable slowing growth” as AI labs struggle to maintain the stratospheric growth they experienced earlier in the AI boom. A cooling period would help “as IPOs look to be pushed out,” Burry noted.

He also panned the negative drumbeat coming from AI leaders as regulatory capture – where the leaders in a space use regulations and slowdowns to thwart up and coming competition. He framed the calls for a slowdown as a marketing ploy ahead of massive IPOs for the AI giants.

The above article goes on to quote JD Vance: “I have to say, just personally, I feel a little bit weird about the fact that you have so many frontier AI tech companies kind of coming to the government and begging the government to regulate them. It feels a little bit to me like a bit of a trojan horse.”