ELECTIONS — EVEN MASSIVELY FRAUDED ONES — SURE HAVE THEM:  Consequences.

SORRY ABOUT THE SONG BUT THIS IS WHAT COMES AFTER THE WHITE PILL:  Staying Alive.

THIS IS THE FUNNIEST TIMELINE:

OPEN THREAD: Because I love you and I want you to be happy.

GOTHAM CITY’S NEWSPAPER OF RECORD:

IT’S SATIRE — OR IS IT…?

DISPATCHES FROM WOKE 2.0:

Earlier from George MF: How Hollywood Lost the Hollywood Press. The economic incentives of the two camps have begun to fatally diverge.

DESERVES GOT NOTHIN’ TO DO WITH IT: Pete Hegseth doesn’t deserve to be impeached.

But it’s okay. Impeachment doesn’t mean anything anymore. And yes, the GOP started this with the Clinton impeachment, which was stupid. If it had succeeded Al Gore would have been the incumbent, which would probably have pushed him over the top in 2000.

JOHN NOLTE: Skydance Fears James Gunn’s Superman Sequel will Lose $100M, Report.

A report now says Skydance is so worried that James Gunn’s Superman (2025) sequel, Man of Tomorrow, is a loser that it might not even warrant a theatrical release.

The report adds that the best the studio is able to hope for is cutting its losses at $100 million.

Unceremoniously firing DC Studios’ co-CEOs James Gunn and Peter Safran five months before their contract was up and eight months before Man of Tomorrow — which probably cost $300 million — was scheduled to hit theaters next July, is an insight into how little faith Skydance CEO David Ellison has in Man of Tomorrow.

Ace of Spades adds:

Matt McGloin has scoops about the upcoming James Gunn Superman sequel, Man of Tomorrow, being canceled, Batgirl-style, with all money spent so far being taken as a tax write off.

Or, he suggests, Man of Tomorrow might be given a cheap post-production budget and just dumped on HBO Max.

I don’t think this is true.

But if it is true, I have a theory about it. Grace Randolf, an idiot SJW biased critic who was nevertheless right that James Gunn was a very poor fit for DC, has been predicting that the new regime at Skydance wants to give Gunn “notes” about the movie — demands about what must be cut (for example, Supergirl’s presence) and what new scenes need to be shot in reshoots.

But James Gunn’s contract states that he gets final cut over the movie.

So: Is it possible that Skydance is putting out word they will straight-up cancel the movie (which has already been almost completely shot) if James Gunn does not give up on his final cut power and accept studio notes?

That’s a scenario that seems plausible to me.

That said, I still don’t know if we can credit any of these “scoops” as true. This seems like a really, really big decision to make. This is an expensive movie. Canceling it saves the money for post-production (editing, music, and of course special effects and marketing), but cancelling it locks in the substantial money already spent as a loss.

I know, I know:

They write it off, Jerry. They write it off.

Posted by: Kramer

If Gunn calls their bluff and says “Fine, cancel it,” do they go forward with the threat?

I don’t know.

Like I said, I don’t know how much of these claims, from a fairly obscure geek-culture news site, are true.

I could see the movie being dumped to streaming, but I would doubt David Ellison wants to begin his tenure as CEO of Skydance’s combined Paramount/Warner Brothers behemoth by doing what David Zazlav became infamous for during his time as Warner’s CEO and taking the tax write-off by Batgirl-ing a perceived dud of a movie: Art Is Dead and David Zaslav Has Killed It: The Dangerous Precedent Warner Bros. Sets by Shelving Completed Films.