GAS LINES IN AN OIL GIANT:

HELTER STELTER:

Flashback to 2017: Stelter Skips Dan Rather Fiasco in 22-Minute Interview on the History of ’60 Minutes.’

CNN Reliable Sources host Brian Stelter routinely trashes President Trump for sticking to ā€œhis safe spaceā€ and doing interviews on Fox News. But on his show on Sunday, he provided the safest of spaces to 60Ā Minutes executive producer Jeff Fager. Both on CNN and in his 22-minute podcast, Stelter discussed the history of the CBS magazoine show without once mentioning Dan Rather or his phony-documents fiasco attacking President George W. Bush on 60 Minutes IIĀ inĀ 2004.

That’s because for Stelter, Dan Rather became one of CNN’s ‘Reliable Sources.’

Stelter often invokes the importance of truth and facts in his run-up to bringing on Rather, whose reputation was shattered for ignoring those things in the defining episode of his career.

Rather reported on documents in 2004 purporting to show George W. Bush had been derelict in his duties and gone absent without leave from the Texas Air National Guard in the 1970s. The documents were almost immediately revealed to be forgeries. CBS and Rather initially stood by the report, but Rather was eventually forced to apologize, and the 60 MinutesĀ producers of the segment were fired. Rather was forced out of the anchor chair in 2005.

However, Rather has long insisted his team was correct and reported the truth about Bush avoiding Vietnam service and shirking his responsibilities with the National Guard. He’s even gotten assistance from Hollywood in what came to be known as “Rathergate.”

A 2015Ā movie based onĀ producer Mary Mapes’s memoir of the affair, calledĀ Truth, starred Robert Redford as Rather, portraying him and Mapes as flawed but heroic in their journalistic pursuits.Ā It was a box office flop and tepidly received by critics, some of whom panned it as didactic, simplistic, and one-sided.Ā The AtlanticĀ called it a “terrible, terrible movie about journalism.”

60 Minutes’ quality control has been uniformly terrible, but as long as it leans hard in Stelter’s direction, all is well in his world.

YOU’RE GONNA NEED A BIGGER BLOG: Nicholas Kristof and the Collapse of Journalistic Standards.

Kristof himself offers a telling hedge in his column. He writes that ā€œit’s impossible to know how common sexual assaults against Palestinians areā€ – which is an interesting disclaimer in a piece that also calls the assaults ā€œsystematic,ā€ ā€œwidely practiced,ā€ and ā€œfrequent.ā€

Adding to all of this, the timing of the piece is highly suspect: published the day before the release of a major Israeli report on Hamas sexual violence during the October 7 attack, which, unlike Kristof’s piece, is deeply sourced with documentary evidence. It’s difficult to view Kristof’s column as anything other than an attempt to shift focus and paint a false moral equivalency.

Ultimately, this is not just another case of Hamas propaganda being laundered for the Western masses. It is a striking example of the disintegration in journalistic standards that is eroding trust in the press. I know many who have published opinion pieces in the New York Times, usually representing moderate viewpoints, and they describe a strenuous fact checking process – but it appears to be selectively enforced.

The Times should have applied particular scrutiny to Kristof given his recent ambitions.

Scrutiny in pursuit of accuracy is no way to push the NYT’s preferred narrative, as Walter Duranty showed the paper almost a century ago.

Nothing has changed since.

A REMINDER THAT EUROPE’S ELITES ARE COMPLETELY DETACHED FROM EUROPEANS:

THE KIDS AREN’T AS ALRIGHT AS YOU THINK: The deeper signal is youth risk did not disappear. It migrated inward.

So the surface looks healthier. Fewer kids drinking. Fewer kids using weed. Fewer kids doing reckless things in public.

The hidden layer looks worse. The young are less reckless because they are less socially embodied. Less initiation. Less unsupervised friction. Less courage-building. Less embarrassment and recovery. Less real dating. Less independence. Less contact with the physical world before adulthood demands it.

The old teenage world produced damage, stupidity, alcohol abuse, pregnancy risk, fights, accidents, and bad decisions. No need to romanticize it. But it also produced social reps. It forced young people through discomfort. It made them practice attraction, rejection, conflict, reputation, risk, repair, and status in the open.

The new world suppresses visible risk while increasing invisible fragility.

That is the trade.

A teenager can avoid drinking, avoid parties, avoid sex, avoid driving, avoid real confrontation, avoid rejection, avoid shame, avoid danger, and still arrive at 23 emotionally underbuilt. Cleaner behavior does not automatically mean stronger formation.

This is why the marriage chart and the teen drinking chart are the same story at different stages. People are not suddenly failing to pair in adulthood. The whole pathway into embodied adulthood has been slowing for years before marriage even becomes the question.

The real truth: society solved part of the teen vice problem by shrinking the arena where teenagers become adults.

I believe this.

THE BEST GUARD AGAINST LYNCHING IS EFFECTIVE AND IMPARTIAL ENFORCEMENT OF THE LAWS:Ā Ā Lynching.

OPEN THREAD: Ring out the weekend.

INSTEAD, THEY WERE THINKING IN DECADES — AND THAT DECADE WAS THE PAUL EHRLICH 1970s:

A FOGGY DAY IN LONDONISTAN: