WHAT A MESS: Conflicting court rulings leave Missouri’s congressional map in limbo.

In one, the U.S. Supreme Court, in an order issued by Justice Brett Kavanaugh, left in place a Missouri Supreme Court ruling from last week that said the map could not be used while a ballot initiative that could lead to voters rejecting the newly drawn district lines moves forward. Kavanaugh handles emergency requests that arise from Missouri.

But soon after, a federal judge in Missouri ruled in favor of two GOP congressional candidates who argue that the new map, which was in place for the August primaries, must be used in November in order to avoid federal constitutional violations. That case could also quickly face U.S. Supreme Court scrutiny with time running out for the map to be finalized. The state’s deadline to finalize ballots was 5 p.m local time, and first ballots are set to go out Sept. 19.

Missouri Gov. Mike Kehoe and Attorney General Catherine Hanaway, both Republicans, said on X Tuesday evening that the redrawn map would be used for the November election.

Or maybe not.

MOST OF MY TEACHERS FROM MIDDLE SCHOOL AND UP WERE MEN, AND ALL THE BEST ONES WERE…:

…and I wish I’d recognized then how great a benefit that was.

ANALYSIS: TRUE.

DISPATCHES FROM THE BLUE ZONES: St. Louis Sheriff’s Office reaches settlement over firing of white, older employees.

EEOC investigated the Sheriff’s Office and found that former Sheriff Alfred Montgomery used his position to terminate nearly a dozen white employees and two black employees for reasons other than their job performance. Before he was sworn in, Montgomery publicly announced that he “could not wait to get rid of these white officers” and “top-heavy” employees, a reference to older workers, the EEOC found.

Montgomery also allegedly referred to the white employees he terminated as a “racist gang.” After firing the white officers, Montgomery allegedly told his former deputy that “he needed to fire a black guy” to buck a lawsuit for discrimination against white employees.

That — and a bunch of other stuff — doesn’t seem to have worked out for him.

GOOD LORD:

More:

4. A decision to go around was made whilst on runway.
5. Above decision was reversed and sealed their fate.

These facts paint a very confusing picture of what was happening on this flight deck. Every approach we brief a plan A, which is obviously to land and stop. But we also set some very clear bottom lines, those that must be met to assure a safe landing. These are decided at a period of low workload, often some distance from the airfield. The time to set these is not when you’re working hard to get the jet down. This is where your capacity is limited and having these bottom lines is key to a safe outcome.

Setting these empowers either pilot to call a go around if these aren’t met. The pilot monitoring should never be thinking “what’s going on now?”

KC-10 Driver added, with just the right amount of understatement, “That’s a really troubling series of events.”

AMERICA’S TEAM’S NEWSPAPER OF RECORD:

THESE ARE HEINLEIN’S CRAZY YEARS — WE JUST LIVE IN THEM:

Don’t forget to get your gestating parent something nice for Gestating Parent Day.

IT’S A BEAUTIFUL SHIP. PAY NO ATTENTION TO THE LOOMING ICEBERG: Alexandra Pechman Came of Age in Early Aughts New York — Her First Feature Magazine Tackles the Time with a Light Touch.

When lockdown hit in March 2020, journalist-turned-filmmaker Alexandra Pechman couldn’t help but get a little nostalgic for the good old days. Who didn’t?

“We couldn’t really look forward, so a lot of people were looking back. We were all inside and everyone was feeling so nostalgic and reading old journals and diaries and talking to people from the past,” Pechman told IndieWire in her first long-form interview for her first feature film, “Magazine.” “I was also looking back at what my career had been, and I kept going back to that kind of cusp-y time at the beginning of my career in magazines. It was the last gasp of the Old World, and so it was that feeling of this complicated nostalgia of, ‘Oh, I really miss that time, but also that time was not great for me or people like me, and why do I miss that?’”

The world of “Magazine” was pulled from Pechman’s own early career in journalism, notably pre-#MeToo. As a young writer in the late aughts, she published stories in Vogue, The New York Times, Vanity Fair, and The New Yorker, and was a staffer at The Paris Review, Aperture, and W magazine. By 2019, Pechman had sold her first script and joined the WGA. And she was trying to get comfy with the idea that, as her filmmaking career was on the rise, she was going to have to say goodbye to journalism.

Her big farewell: a delightfully winsome, extremely smart first feature, captures the specifics of the time (it’s set in 2011) while hinting at what very much needs to change in the years to come. The film stars Lily McInerny as starry-eyed poet Nora, who alights on a summer internship at the lauded lit mag Platen, where she meets fellow interns, played by Lukita Maxwell, Ruby Cruz, and Daniel Zolghadri, plus an alluring older editor, played by Joshuah Melnick.

As John Podhoretz tweets:

In 2011, when I reviewed The September Issue, a cringe-inducing documentary starring Anna Wintour and the staffers of Vogue, I wrote:

It’s a fascinating time capsule of a film, sort of the Titanic or Last Days of Pompeii of the New York magazine industry. And beyond the world of Vogue depicted in the movie itself, of a supremely competent insular liberal Masters of the Universe worldview just before the lights went out on the world’s economy, and elites got what they wanted in the years that followed — good and hard, as Mencken would say. President Obama likes to say that Americans have been pretty soft in recent years; he need only watch this film to see how right he was about his core constituency. When Occupy Wall Street complains of “The One Percent” and their enormous wealth, well, come and see the plutocratic excess inherent in the system.

Still though, forget ‘80s nostalgia. I can understand early 2010s nostalgia among coddled leftists when compared with the autophagy they’re faced with today: “You Better Get Ready for … War”: Socialists Call for “War in the Streets” and the End of Capitalism. “‘The Democrats cannot be reasoned with. They must be destroyed.’ There is little subtlety in the message, [University of California Santa Barbara History Professor Butch Ware] has explained: ‘You cannot call yourself a revolutionary and not be talking about training with weapons.’”

CHINA AND SOUTHEAST ASIA, THE CASE FOR BOMBING:

HOW MILES DAVIS AND JOHN COLTRANE CHANGED JAZZ FOREVER:

Both musicians were products of the 1940s bebop age. Davis joined Charlie Parker’s group in 1944, long before he had the technique, by his own admission, to keep pace with Parker’s breakneck improvisations. Coltrane hailed from a generation of saxophonists – including Sonny Rollins, Lee Konitz and Paul Desmond – who picked up the pieces after Parker had roared through jazz like a tornado, smashing the existing landscape, before dying, aged just 34, in 1955. The rhythmic and melodic complexity of Parker’s work threw down the gauntlet. Matching his intensity and perfecting the techniques of his music was not enough. Parker upped the ante constantly, never settling for the songs he’d already worked out how to play.

Davis and Coltrane had been aware of each other during the early 1950s, but properly entered each other’s orbits in 1955, when Coltrane auditioned for a quintet Davis was organizing. Davis had quit Parker’s group just before Christmas 1948, finding himself increasingly unwilling to deal with the saxophonist’s self-destructive addictions. In that spirit of renewal, Davis’s antidote to four years of improvising around Parker’s high-tempo melodic obstacle courses was to start a nine-piece ensemble in collaboration with arranger Gil Evans and baritone saxophonist Gerry Mulligan, which favored instead airy and spacious arrangements, heavily influenced by the perfumed delicacy of the French composers Maurice Ravel and Claude Debussy. If Parker’s music had been “hot,” this group leaned toward the “cool” – and the records they made would be subsequently anthologized as Birth of the Cool.

Coltrane passed his audition and Davis’s new quintet aimed to fuse hot and cool. The titles of the four albums they recorded in 1956, Cookin’, Workin’, Relaxin’ and Steamin’, tell you something of the emotional palette the group encompassed, from “When I Fall In Love,” an early taste of the cut-glass fineness of Davis’s approach to playing a ballad, to their stampeding reboot of Sonny Rollins’s “Airegin.” With its emotional range and the space Davis was prepared to give his musicians to develop their improvisations, his quintet surpassed even Parker’s work. But in 1957, Davis let his saxophonist go. Coltrane had cultivated a debilitating drug dependency – and having recently shaken his own habit, going cold turkey, Davis recognized the dangers and knew Coltrane had to get himself clean. The Davis/Coltrane mythology properly began when the quintet reunited a year later. Classic album followed classic album, each fresh installment apparently compelling the music to follow a radical new direction. Milestones, from 1958, used hectic compositions to kick-start muscular, finger-popping improvisations. By comparison, Kind of Blue, recorded a year later, was strikingly sparse and introverted.

Speaking of which, from me in 2019: The 60th Anniversary of Kind of Blue: Miles Davis’ Masterpiece.

WAIT, WHAT? Lethal Injections: Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell. “You know she has a charmed life when she can leisurely reanimate each morning with a fresh cup of coffee and access to all paywalled media sites. Such is my morning routine because, yes, I have a pretty lovely life; however, the idyllic process was interrupted today when I simultaneously inhaled and spat the aforementioned coffee when I read that the State of Georgia purchased its lethal injection cocktail from a pharmaceutical supplier based out of a West London driving school.”