April 13, 2026

CHANGE?

Posted at 3:01 pm by Stephen Green

TED KACZYNSKI, CALL YOUR OFFICE: ‘Close to midnight’: Alleged Sam Altman firebomber wrote of fears AI would end humanity. “San Francisco police said Daniel Alejandro Moreno-Gama threw a Molotov cocktail at Altman’s home on Russian Hill shortly before 4 a.m. Friday, though security personnel were able to extinguish the fire without injury. Officers arrested him hours later near OpenAI’s Mission Bay headquarters, where they said he was threatening to burn down the building.”

Posted at 2:46 pm by Stephen Green

OH:

Posted at 2:29 pm by Stephen Green

SAD: Another Red State, Fully Californicated. “Instead of Silicon Mountain, Colorado is quickly becoming ‘an economic backwater,’ as SLI put it, ‘an omen for what happens when Red states go blue.'”

Posted at 2:15 pm by Stephen Green

A SMALL MEASURE OF ACCOUNTABILITY:

Posted at 2:13 pm by Glenn Reynolds

SPOILER: THE ENTIRE FIELD OF JOURNALISM IS FILLED WITH COWARDLY, DUPLICITOUS, FRIGHTENED LITTLE LAMBS WHO CAN’T TELL THE TRUTH UNLESS THEIR BOSS GIVES THEM PERMISSION.

Plus this from George MF Washington: “And in any case, the ‘wrong’ reporter getting a story is never an excuse to spike the story. When Watergate started to blow up, there was a discussion of taking the story away from Woodstein and giving it to a big name national story. Spiking it because it no longer fit the mandate of the Metro division was never an option.”

Posted at 1:59 pm by Stephen Green

PROBABLY, YEAH:

And here’s why:

Dems are scared to death of losing any more of the Catholic vote.

Posted at 1:28 pm by Stephen Green

GREAT TRAINING SHOES: I went to a training event recently and got to wear the new Brooks Women’s Glycerin Flex Neutral Running & Walking Shoe. The shoes are supposed to move with your feet and be more flexible and they were, but also provided stability. I bought a pair and am very happy with them Give them a try if you need a cross-purpose shoe.

Posted at 1:15 pm by Helen Smith

THANKS TO EVERYONE WHO SENT EMAIL MESSAGES ON SATURDAY TO DEFEAT THE NEW ACA7:  If you didn’t see my post on Saturday and would like to help me out by sending an quick email to 10 California state senators opposing ACA7, you can still access that post here.  There were several incorrect email addresses in my post on Saturday morning, but they have since been fixed.

I have a second request for those of you who are on Twitter/X.   I need my last four tweets/posts to be “liked” and “re-tweeted/reposted” as many times as possible.  Unfortunately, my tech skill leave something to be desired, and I have forgotten how to embed things, so all I can do is link to them.

Here they are:  Tweet #1, Tweet #2, Tweet #3, and Tweet #4.  (If you’re interested in my issues and want to follow me while you’re at it, that would be swell too.)

Loyal Instapundit readers may recall that I asked you to do this two years ago too, and it worked splendidly.  It was hugely important in showing the California legislators who were tagged that ACA7 was going to face stiff opposition.  These days Twitter/X works a little differently.  Elon Musk’s reforms were actually good, but they make it impossible to bury the tagged persons in little alerts in quite the same way.  Even so, getting a large number of “likes” and “re-tweets/re-posts” will be a big help.

For those of you who just woke up and have no idea what I’m taking about, here is the description, I gave of ACA7 in an earlier post:

THEY’RE BAAAACK!! AND NOW THEY WANT TO DISCRIMINATE BY RACE IN STUDENT FINANCIAL AID!!:  Legislators in the California Assembly are at it again—trying to gut Proposition 209, the history-making ballot initiative that amended the state constitution in 1996 to ban state-sponsored preferential treatment on the basis of race, sex, or ethnicity.  And I literally mean “history-making.”  Paul Johnson’s History of the American People tells the story of America from the late 15th century to the end of the 20th.  Somehow (bless him) he found a wee bit of room to discuss Prop 209.  As the co-chair of that 1996 campaign, I’m darn proud of that.

This is the third time in six years that the Cal Legislature has moved to gut Prop 209’s ban on affirmative-action preferences.  In 2020, the Legislature put a referendum on the ballot to repeal Prop 209 entirely.  But it was THUMPINGLY defeated—over 57% of voters said NO—even though YES Campaign spent 14 times more than we did.  (I’m proud of having co-chaired that campaign too.)  In 2024, the Assembly approved a trickier version that would have empowered the governor to make an unlimited number of EXCEPTIONS to Prop 209.  But that version never made it past the Senate. Cooler heads prevailed there—largely because we descended on their offices, held rallies, and buried them in letters, emails, and tweets.

But they just can’t stop.  The newest effort would exempt public education from Prop 209’s coverage.  Given the Supreme Court’s 2023 decision in the Harvard case, this bill does not try to exempt admissions in higher education.  But it exempts everything else.  The big-ticket items would be (1) discrimination in admission to programs for gifted and talented students at the Kindergarten-12th grade level; (2) discrimination funding of K-12 schools based on the racial composition of the students there; and (3) discrimination in financial aid in higher education.

I am confident ACA7 can be defeated in the Senate if we make enough noise.  Given what happened in 2020, they would have to be very silly to want to put this turkey on the ballot.  We will probably win at the ballot box (as we did in 2020).  Even if we don’t, any program established under ACA7 will likely be defeated in court.  And the Trump Administration will undertake to cut off the federal funding of California’s public universities and schools under Title VI.  All we have to do is remind the California Senate of that over and over again until it finally sinks in.

Posted at 1:14 pm by Gail Heriot

THE USUAL SILENCE FROM THE USUAL SUSPECTS:

Posted at 12:57 pm by Stephen Green

HMM: Trump Administration Decides to Keep the Biden Era ‘Frame or Receiver’ Definition in Place. “The following month, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a disappointing decision upholding the ATF’s ‘Frame or Receiver’ rule, a relic of the Biden Administration. Rather than dismissing the appeal or withdrawing the Biden ATF regulation before the Court ruled, the Trump Administration chose to continue defending the gun control rule, allowing the Court to issue a decision that preserved President Biden’s regulatory overreach.”

Posted at 12:42 pm by Stephen Green

THIS:

Previously: “This is where ‘Drill, baby, drill’ meets MAGA foreign policy, so to those America Only people still fuming that Trump isn’t (and never was) an isolationist, now do you get it?”

Posted at 11:55 am by Stephen Green

DATA SHOWS RED STATES BEST FOR FAMILIES: Nine out of the top 10 states for healthy, intact families are Red, compared to eight out of the bottom 10 being Blue states, according to new analysis. Ya think there might be a connection there?

Posted at 11:52 am by Mark Tapscott