JIMMY CARTER SAYS YES: Democrats Don’t Want You to Know What Jimmy Carter Said About Voter ID.

In 2005, Carter co-chaired the bipartisan Carter-Baker Commission on Federal Election Reform alongside former Secretary of State James Baker. The commission formed in the aftermath of the 2000 presidential election.

The commission recommended voter ID, better voter registration, and stronger safeguards against fraud, and it did so with bipartisan support. In a resurfaced clip from that era, Carter is heard making the case for voter ID in terms today’s Democrats would call bigoted.

“Also have some form of photo ID required, voter ID,” Carter said. “So, the second reason is to make a uniform recommendation in our country through this report that we’ve issued, so that there’s not highly discriminatory laws passed by one party or another.”

Carter went further, explaining exactly how the commission designed the policy to prevent the very harms Democrats now claim are inevitable.

“These photo ID cards will be free,” Carter said. “There will be a wide distribution of them. The states will be required to go around the state to issue these photo ID cards to as many people as possible, which will be a good system just for recruiting new voters.”

Classical reference in headline:

FROM A STUDENT, A ‘VIA MEDIA’ ON AI. I suspect this is about where most people will end up, once the hype/doom cycle starts to get boring. I do think the concern about it destroying writing skills is misplaced, though, because writing skills had been destroyed years before AI came around.

THE VITAL NEED TO STOP 5G DEPLOYMENT WAS IN THERE SOMEWHERE, TOO:

CUT TAXES, CUT SPENDING, LEAVE US ALONE, AND EVERYTHING WILL BE ALL RIGHT:

THE MORAL EQUIVALENT OF WAR: “Thank You for Your Service,” Dr Fauci — Appropriating Greetings to U.S. Warriors Is in the Direct Lineage of Leftist Cosplays of Valorous Combat Heroics.

Let’s start with a question that many of you will (correctly) find is naïve, but will be stated for the record: if Joe Biden pardoned Fauci, how much did the (p)resident — or his enablers — know? How much did he know about the whole Covid (non?-)pandemic? And if the whole democrat party apparatus was complicit in knowing about Fauci’s lies, does that not make it a conspiracy?  Is, then, a “conspiracy theory” not the appropriate response to this scandal — one of a magnitude never seen before?

Having said that: One thing that has been fairly unsettling in the latest Fauci revelations is going back to the the many MSM interviews regarding the COVID “menace” half a decade ago and hearing the “independent” journalists calling Anthony Fauci things like a “superhero.”

Unlike Norma Desmond, at the end of the line, he’s finally not ready for his closeup:

Exit question: Pure Gold: Rand Paul’s Perfect Reaction to Fauci’s Wife’s Rude Gesture After Contempt Vote.

(Classical reference in headline.)

THIS IS KIND OF A BIG DEAL: US hits jackpot after finding multi-million-ton critical mineral reserve in Nevada.

The company revealed that the deposit is part of a mineral system that also contains world-class resources of lithium, potash, and boron.

As per 3PL, the deposit is reportedly five times larger than the biggest tungsten resource currently listed in the US and comes at a time when the country relies heavily on imports for the strategic metal. Its in-situ value is estimated at about USD 152 billion based on current market prices.

However, exploration across approximately 17 square miles of the project remains restricted by a NASA land withdrawal. The space agency uses the area to calibrate satellite instruments. It says mining could interfere with the facility’s operations.

That seems like a solvable problem. The tougher one might be CCP-friendly Americans lobbying to restrict mining to save the planet or whatever.

THAT WAS DELIGHTFUL:

HE’S BEEN DEAD SINCE MARCH…:

…the delay is just the internal power struggle over the succession, which presumably has finally been settled.

CHANGE? Trump targets birth tourism and citizenship in new executive orders.

Trump’s administration argues that the ruling still grants him the authority to limit birthright citizenship under longstanding exceptions recognized by the court. The executive orders only apply only to future births tied to four categories:

Children born of foreign diplomatic staff working on behalf of another government while in the U.S. The 14th Amendment doesn’t confer automatic citizenship on ambassadors’ families, and this order would expand that category to other noncitizen employees.

Children of people who are classified as alien enemies, including those who belong to federally declared terrorist groups. The 14th Amendment doesn’t apply to invading armies, and this designation would expand that category.

Those born in U.S. territories — but only if Congress changes the law to end automatic citizenship there. A bill seeking to do that was introduced last month but isn’t expected to pass. This would apply most notably to those in Puerto Rico.

Children born of mothers who expressly and deceptively enter the U.S. for the sole purpose of having a child here, namely at a birth-tourism center. The order seeks to limit the use of surrogate mothers for this purpose as well.

Will they hold up in court?