“MESSAGE: I CARE,” THE NEXT GENERATION. Braindead Politician Accidentally Reads AI Slop That Someone Left in His Speech: “Here’s a More Natural, Flowing Version of That Section That Reads Like a Legislative Speech.”

AI chatbots and politicians who aren’t even pretending to try anymore are a match made in heaven.

Exhibit A: Canadian lawmaker Bill Oliver, who made a strange, cyborgian digression in a speech addressing the New Brunswick legislature last month.

“Public confidence in the office of an advocate matters,” Oliver intoned, before offering a bizarre non sequitur.

“Here’s a more natural, flowing version of that section that reads like a legislative speech rather than a series of short points,” he added.

Oliver, in a distinctly 2026 twist, had accidentally read a prompt from an AI chatbot. Credit where credit’s due: he did it without blinking an eye, betraying either some serious stage composure or that he didn’t even notice the error, half-asleep as he sounded while mumbling through the machine-amalgamated pablum.

In any case, members of the New Brunswick subreddit, understandably, weren’t impressed after people began noticing the error this week.

“If there are no consequences for this, then we hold our high schoolers to a higher standard than our elected officials,” one commenter fumed.

“If he was a lawyer, he’d be sanctioned,” another wrote. “Why should it be any different for an elected representative?”

Others lamented the “depressing” state of affairs Oliver’s lazy AI slip-up evinced, using words like “grim” and “idiocracy.” There were multiple calls for him to resign.

As Charles Krauthammer wrote in 2012:

George H. W. Bush, Romney-like in aloofness, was once famously handed a staff cue card that read: “Message: I care.” That was supposed to be speech guidance. Bush read the card. Out loud.

Not surprisingly, he lost to Bill Clinton, a man who lives to care, who feels your pain better than you do — or at least makes you think so. In politics, that’s a trivial distinction.

Not surprisingly, (P)resident Biden had a similar gaffe in 2024:

If only some staffer had secretly snuck a “Madagascar” into Oliver’s AI prompt:

EVERY INSTITUTION HAS BEEN CORRUPTED:

IT VINDICATES WHAT I SAW IN COLORADO ELECTIONS IN 2012:  NJ Republican says motor voter scandal vindicates years of election integrity warnings, pushes for legislative probe.

And seriously, in the name of all that’s holy, who thought allowing people to register to vote without proof of citizenship or sometimes without proof of identity was a good thing? I can’t explain this to my foreign relatives, who have decided there must be something else going on, because the idea is so bizarrely stupid. Even they don’t do that, and let me tell you–

I DISAGREE WITH FRANCIS: Pangram and Substack, why the whining?  My suspicious brain thinks it could be that they don’t want to be found out.

What do I disagree with? Well… first, that using AI detection tools is a good thing. In my experience, including various experiments I’ve run, they are about as good as early COVID tests, and therefore I discourage them for the same reason. If your results are as good as flipping a coin, and if people are going to do the stupid in answer to the test: DON’T DO IT. (Not that I’m going to disable it in my substacks. Couldn’t be bothered.)

Second, I disagree with him on the “tells” of AI. I have found a lot of tells myself (Look, my guilty pleasure if JAFF which at this point is almost all AI written) including an unhinged love for all forms of the verb “perform” used in the most bizarre places and times. Also a certain confusion about how many parents go into making a human which leads to sentences such as “inherited her eyes from one of her fathers.” This stuff seems to crop up consistently, as does an inability to understand physicality or distance. BUT sentence structure and cadence is mostly going to ping all the writers that AI was trained on.  Writers like me whom Anthropic wholesale used as training material. And seriously, people, I was abusing the English language long before AI was a twinkle in a server’s eye. My bizarre tricks of construction are very much the mark of a human being. Also if we’re going to chase sentence structure, there is a lot of room to find witches everywhere.

Mostly I’m tired of all the nonsense. There’s good and there’s bad. There’s entertaining or not. How it’s produced is a matter of complete indifference to me.

Only if you’re using a clanker to write JAFF, can you please for the sake of all that’s holy edit out all the performing? The rest is sometimes hilarious, but the performing is just tedious.

THE “CONSPIRACY THEORISTS” KEEP BEING VINDICATED:

BORE EAGLE:

It’s not 2020 anymore guys, get with the times.

OPEN THREAD: Tuesday’s groovy.

MILE MARKERS ON THE ROAD TO DETROIT:

As Glenn has written, “the breakdown of law and order won’t go as [leftists] hope. Ultimately, the police are there to protect criminals from the populace, not the other way around. Get rid of the police, and armed vigilantism is what you’ll get. And what you’ll deserve.”

Back in 2013, Reason TV released a video about private security forces in otherwise lawless Detroit. It looks like the Pacific Palisades is adopting a similar idea as well.

RICK MCGINNIS: The Taking of Pelham One Two Three: New York Goes Down.

When The Taking of Pelham One Two Three came out in the fall of 1974, New York City was building up to a fiscal crisis and a year away from president Gerald Ford’s statement that he would refuse to give the city a bailout, which led to the famous New York Daily News headline “FORD TO CITY: DROP DEAD”.

The exodus of jobs and residents that was underway by the late ’60s shrank the city’s tax base while a budget deficit that began with mayor Robert F. Wagner’s administration in the early ’60s was compounded by Wagner’s successor, John Lindsay, borrowing heavily to improve city services. New York was funding free tuition at the City University of New York and keeping transit fares low while relying on federal aid to make it from year to year.

Meanwhile in the movie theatres the “New York as shithole” genre had come into focus with Midnight Cowboy in 1969, followed by Cotton Comes to Harlem (1970), Shaft, The French Connection and The Panic in Needle Park in 1971, Super Fly and Across 110th Street in 1972 and Badge 373, The Seven-Ups, Mean Streets, Black Caesar, Willie Dynamite, Gordon’s War, Hell up in Harlem and Serpico in 1973.

The Taking of Pelham One Two Three shared screens in 1974 with Claudine, Three the Hard Way, Crazy Joe and Death Wish and, as the city’s fiscal crisis became global headlines, was followed by Dog Day Afternoon and Report to the Commissioner in 1975 before the cinematic capstones to the subgenre: Taxi Driver (1976) and The Warriors (1979).

Perhaps this genre will be making a cinematic return in a few years: NYC: Begun, the Class War Has.

AMERICA’S NEWSPAPER OF RECORD:

IT’S NEWS WHEN A NETWORK COVERS THE NEWS NOWADAYS:

Related:

Plus:

And: