CHRISTIAN TOTO: Bill Maher to Macklemore âYou Donât Know S***.â
â[The 9/11 terrorists] werenât cowards. But Iâll tell you who is. Democratic party politicians, and Iâll tell you why. Because nowhere has this moral confusion become more obvious than in a place called Gaza, a little strip of land that was not part of the original Israel but which they won in a war launched against them, but then gave back as a peace gesture,â Maher said. âDid they tell you that part on TikTok, kids?â
âThe people who run Gaza, Hamas, who you celebrate as a liberation movement but are really a terrorist mafia gang just like the one that terrorizes Haiti, only ever used it to stage attacks on Israel,â he said.
He was just warming up.
Next, he attacked (not by name) celebrities like Mark Ruffalo, Javier Bardem and Hannah Einbinder who relentlessly attack Israel and praise the Palestinian cause.
âI think Macklemore spoke for all clueless celebrities when he said, âI know enough to know this is a genocide. Actually, you donât know s***.â
Macklemore recently lectured the crowd at an Ed Sheeran concert with his pro-Palestinian talking points, drawing outrage from select Jewish groups.
âItâs not a genocide. Itâs a counter-attack in a war, a war thatâs been waged on Israel since 1948 based on the ridiculous premise that Jews donât belong in the one place on earth they are indigenous,â he said. âHey geniuses, theyâre the Indians in this scenario.â
At RedState, Nick Arama adds: Bill Maher Decimates the Media, Radical Islam, and the Left in a Brilliant 9/11 Take.
So much has changed since 9/11, he remarked. “For example, back then, we were against the terrorists,” he said. He went on to note how the liberal media are too timid now even to use the “T” word, or call them what they are.
“Really? We can’t anymore just say out loud who the bad guys were that morning? Those 19 hijackers? They shared something. Oh, let’s call it a worldview. And it wasn’t astrology. But somehow, over time, we’ve decided not to harp on that, the whole business about who wanted us dead and why. Let’s not put a name on it.”
He referenced how Canada’s “state TV” – the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (CBC) – told its people not to refer to the 9/11 attacks as “terrorist attacks.” “What should we call it then?” he asked. “Unruly passenger? A wrong turn taken at the Chrysler Building?” He noted how the BBC said using the term “terrorist” could be a barrier to understanding. “You know what’s really a barrier to understanding?” Maher stated. “Lying.”
It is a clash of civilizations, he asserted, between radical Islamism and Western civilization. Then he chastised liberals who wound up on the wrong side of that equation, on “their side.”
“One in 5 young Americans has a positive view of Osama Bin Laden. He’s like Luigi Mangione in a turban!” Maher snarked.
Maher also chastised the people who thought the worst thing was that “innocent Muslims came under suspicion.” No, he said, the worst thing was that nearly 3,000 people were killed that day.
Still licking their chops over the outcome of the 2000 election, there were a fair amount of leftists in America who held those views immediately after 9/11, but in the pre-Twitter and Facebook world of the early naughts, they stewed on their own forums and blogs. In 2004, Charles Krauthammer coined âthe Pressure Cooker Theory of Hydraulic Releaseâ to explain why the left exploded after temporarily maintaining a veneer of civility:
The hostility, resentment, envy and disdain, all superheated in Florida, were not permitted their natural discharge. Came Sept. 11 and a lid was forced down. How can you seek revenge for a stolen election by a nitwit usurper when all of a sudden we are at war and the people, bless them, are rallying around the flag and hailing the commander in chief? With Bush riding high in the polls, with flags flying from pickup trucks (many of the flags, according to Howard Dean, Confederate), the president was untouchable.
The Democrats fell unnaturally silent. For two long, agonizing years, they had to stifle and suppress. It was the most serious case of repression since Freudâs Anna O. went limp. The forced deference nearly killed them. And then, providentially, they were saved. The clouds parted and bad news rained down like manna: WMDs, Abu Ghraib, Richard Clarke, Paul OâNeill, Joe Wilson and, most important, continued fighting in Iraq.
With the president stripped of his halo, his ratings went down. The spell was broken. He was finally, once again, human and vulnerable. With immense relief, the critics let loose.
The result has been volcanic. The subject of one prominent new novel is whether George W. Bush should be assassinated. This is all quite unhinged. Good God. What if Bush is reelected? If they lose to him again, Democrats will need more than just consolation. Theyâll need therapy.
Plus ça change, plus câest la mĂŞme chose.