October 15, 2026

RAVING AND DROOLING: “He’s got an IQ of about three.” Roger Waters launches astonishing attack on James Hetfield over past political statements, following the Metallica frontman’s controversial words at The Sphere in Las Vegas.

Earlier this week, Waters, 83, appeared on a new episode of the podcast The Katie Halper Show, where the host, an American left-wing commentator, guided the musician through some of Metallica’s past politically conscious lyrics, including those on 1986’s Disposable Heroes and 1988’s …And Justice For All.

Halper then showed Waters an interview Hetfield gave in 2007, around their performance at the climate change charity concert Live Earth, where he said “politics drive me crazy”.

She went on to revisit the time in 2008 when Hetfield reacted to Metallica’s music being played during the US torture of Iraqi prisoners (he explained in a separate interview that he was partially “bummed” about it and didn’t want the band “being attached to some political statement”).

After this whistle-stop tour of Hetfield’s political history, Waters is asked for his reaction. “He’s just showing that he’s a complete prick,” he states. “He’s got an IQ of about three, and why we’re talking about him, I don’t even know, because he’s a nobody. He may have a few hundred million dollars or whatever, but he’s a prick.”

Why, it’s as if:

Posted at 4:30 pm by Ed Driscoll

VOLDEMORT’S “HE WHO MUST NOT BE NAMED” CLAUSE JUST BECAME LAW IN MINNESOTA: At least, that’s how the Foley School Board seems to be operating, repeatedly silencing parents advocating for their disabled son simply for mentioning school officials’ names and job titles. Never mind that Minnesota law explicitly makes those names and titles public information, or that the First Amendment doesn’t have a special exception for bureaucrats who would rather not be criticized.

Posted at 4:00 pm by Greg Lukianoff

AND THIS IS WITH THE GOP IN CHARGE; DEMS WILL MAKE IT WORSE: Even by Recent Standards, This Year’s Continuing Resolution Is a Disaster. “The Pentagon solvency plan to cash flow these bills includes above threshold reprogramming (ATR) actions submitted to Congress, an emergency supplemental request, deferring whatever can wait, and slowing accelerated procurement plans. This last piece, along with the sources the Pentagon was forced to use in reprogramming requests, poses the biggest problem. Deferring and delaying training and facilities maintenance and using the savings to cover budget shortfalls is exactly what led to the readiness problems and expensive facilities backlog the Department has been trying to rectify. Reprogramming sources include shipbuilding, Air Force aircraft procurement, Army base operation support and missile procurement, and many small cuts to research programs. Again, the same list of priorities that left unfunded for years led to the manufacturing, supply chain and stockpile deficiencies the Department is trying to fix.”

Posted at 3:51 pm by Stephen Green

SPLC IS A HATE GROUP:

My former PJ Media colleague Tyler O’Neil has been all over the SPLC for years.

Posted at 3:35 pm by Stephen Green

MEANWHILE, OVER AT VODKAPUNDIT: So Long, and Thanks for All the Learing Centers. “It’s said that absence makes the heart grow fonder, but what’s there to say about a governor who, after two terms, could only make a positive contribution to his state by suffering a retroactive total existence failure?”

Posted at 3:25 pm by Stephen Green

“PEOPLE LIKE HIM” USED TO BE CODE FOR YOU-KNOW-WHO:

But it’s different now because they mean well or whatever.

Posted at 3:04 pm by Stephen Green

THE “IT’S DIFFERENT WHEN WE DO IT PARTY” IS SHOCKED WHEN A LEFTIST IS INVESTIGATED:

Posted at 2:22 pm by Ed Driscoll

KDJ: Today’s Democrats: Not the Commies Our Grandfathers Faced. “Our forefathers stood nose-to-nose against dangerous Marxists who were trained to kill them. If my grandad knew that today’s commies have traded in their AK-47s for breast implants, he’d smack me upside my head for not punching the lipstick off ‘Amanda’ (a man, duh!) for twerking in a classroom full of kids.”

Posted at 2:18 pm by Stephen Green

LONG POST, WORTH YOUR TIME:

Key takeaway: “Women don’t want sexual behavior to be discussed explicitly, because it makes it more difficult for them to use it to their advantage. The ambiguity and optionality work to their advantage. If a hot guy hits on them, they can receive the advance. If an ugly guy hits on them, they can reject him and say they weren’t asking to be hit on. If one woman tries to slut shame another for an outfit that distracts men, the wearer can claim that she’s simply wearing something that’s comfortable and cute.”

Posted at 2:02 pm by Stephen Green

SHANE GILLIS, BY MAKING A SNARKY COMMENT, THREATENED WOMEN’S SEXUAL POWER AND SENT THEIR DEFENSE MECHANISMS INTO OVERDRIVE:

Posted at 1:35 pm by Ed Driscoll

QUESTION ASKED AND ANSWERED:

Posted at 1:35 pm by Ed Driscoll

YOU DON’T EVEN HAVE TO HAVE GROWN UP WITH ANIMAL HOUSE TO KNOW WHAT A BIG LETDOWN THIS IS:

Posted at 1:32 pm by Stephen Green